Mertens v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
| Rocky Joe Mertens |
| State of Alabama, Theresia Qualls, Dr. Lindsey, Misty Holcomb and Alabama Deparment of Corrections |
| staff attorney 4 |
| 7:2018cv00654 |
| April 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Western Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John E Ott |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Based on its review of the record in this case, the Court finds no misstatements of law in the magistrate judges report and no plain error in the magistrate judges factual findings regarding Mr. Mertenss medical treatment during the 17-day period in the Franklin County Jail or Officer Quallss alleged retaliatory conduct. Therefore, the Court adopts the magistrate judges report and accepts his recommendation to grant the defendants motions for summary judgment on those claims. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 4/26/2019. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that the 18 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 USC 1404; DIRECTING the Clerk to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this action. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/25/2018. (wcl, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 4/27/2018.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
