Etienne v. Jose et al
Mercelin Etienne |
Elizabeth Jayesh Jose and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
7:2018cv01265 |
August 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Western Office |
XX US, Outside State |
L Scott Coogler |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER This Court acknowledges receipt of the Plaintiff's notice of dismissal #6 filed on September 12, 2018. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs are taxed as paid. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/26/2018. (PSM) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Mercelin Etienne (Hornsby, Warner) |
Filing 5 JOINDER in Notice of Removal filed by Elizabeth Jayesh Jose. (Colclough, Steven) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. filed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (Holtsford, Alex) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company.(Holtsford, Alex) |
Filing 2 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/9/2018. (PSM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company from Circuit Court of Greene County, case number 35-cv-2018-900059., filed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.