Buggs v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Dynassus Nual Buggs
Defendant: Steven T Marshall, State of Alabama and Bradley Almond
Case Number: 7:2018cv01390
Filed: August 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Referring Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to supply any additional evidentiary materials or legal arguments he may wish to offer with regard to whether the petition is subject to summary dismissal. Thereafter, the court will take the petition under advisement for consideration in light of Respondents answer, the state court record and any additional materials supplied by Petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/25/2018. (TLM, )
October 25, 2018 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Steven T Marshall, State of Alabama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Scales, Robin)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Respondents have moved for an additional fourteen (14) days to respond to the undersigneds Order to Show Cause, citing work load and inability to gather relevant exhibits. (Doc. 6). Finding good cause and no prejudice to the petitioner, the motion is GRANTED. The response is due October 25, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/11/2018. (TLM, )
October 11, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Steven T Marshall, State of Alabama. (Scales, Robin) Modified on 10/25/2018 (TLM, ).
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED Respondents appear and show cause in writing within forty-two (42) days from the date of this Order, why the relief Petitioner requests should not be granted. The response should include a thorough discussion of all matters of fact and law relating to Petitioners claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 8/30/2018. (KEK)
August 29, 2018 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Alabama Middle; Case Number 2:18-cv-00711. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. #2 ) is adopted. (2) This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the transfer. This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/29/2018. (kh, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]
August 29, 2018 Case transferred to Northern District of Alabama.. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF transfer to Clerk. (kh, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]
August 29, 2018 Case reopened (kh, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]
August 27, 2018 No objections filed to the #2 Recommendation. (no pdf document attached to this entry)(kh, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]
August 7, 2018 Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama under 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/7/2018. (kh, ) [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]
August 2, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 4602050191.), filed by Dynassus Nual Buggs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Receipt)(kr, ) (Attachment 9 replaced on 8/6/2018) (kh, ). [Transferred from Alabama Middle on 8/29/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buggs v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven T Marshall
Represented By: Robin D Scales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Represented By: Robin D Scales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Almond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynassus Nual Buggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?