Hinton v. Pickensville Police Department et al
| Jimmy Hinton |
| Casey Edmonds, Carrollton Police Department, Pickensville Police Department and Carrollton Sheriffs Department |
| 7:2018cv01627 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to 11/6/2018 Order re #4 filed by Jimmy Hinton. (TLM, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER The Court has granted Plaintiff's Motion for leave to Proceed Informa Pauperis and denied Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. #3 Therefore, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to provide the Court with current addresses for all defendants to enable the Court to effect service. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/6/2018. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER The Court has received Plaintiff's Complaint #1 and Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and Motion to appoint counsel. #2 Plaintiff's Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/5/2018. (PSM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jimmy Hinton. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carrollton Police Department, Carrollton Sheriffs Department, Casey Edmonds, Pickensville Police Department, filed by Jimmy Hinton.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
