Turner v. Hutton et al
| Dalvin Marquez Turner |
| John Hutton and Ford |
| 7:2018cv01804 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER the Plaintiff failed to comply with either of the court's orders within the time prescribed, the court ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. No costs are taxed. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 12/10/2018. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER the Plaintiff must sign and return to the Clerk the attached copy of the complaint within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/1/2018. (AFS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee; however, if he proceeds with this action, plaintiff shall remain obligated to pay the full filing fee of $350 as set out herein. Plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/1/2018. (AFS)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dalvin Marquez Turner. (AFS) (AFS, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ford, John Hutton, filed by Dalvin Marquez Turner.(AFS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
