Atmore v. Abernathy
William Cleophas Atmore |
Ron Abernathy, John H Roberts, John Paul Weber and Bailey |
7:2019cv01268 |
August 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Gray M Borden |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DISMISSAL ORDER - Plaintiff William Cleophas Atmore filed a motion to dismiss (doc. #4 ), which the court construes as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs taxed as paid. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 9/4/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by William Cleophas Atmore. (KEK) |
Filing 3 ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his jail and/or prison account statements. (Doc. #2 ). The application is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). The plaintiffs inmate account statements indicate he received average monthly deposits of $198.17 and had an average prison or jail account balance of $82.83 for the last six months. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/12/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Cleophas Atmore. (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ron Abernathy, filed by William Cleophas Atmore.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.