Dunn v. Poe et al
Jane Doe #4 and Megan Dunn |
Deborah Johnson, Gilbert Jean, JC Poe, Jr, Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation, Dr Marcus O'Mary and Roger Wilson |
7:2019cv01571 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/29/2019. (PSM) |
Filing 14 J.C. Poe, Jr., and Deborah Johnson's ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint, by Deborah Johnson.(Donahue, Timothy) |
Filing 13 Dr. Marcus O'Mary, Roger Wilson and Gilbert Jean's ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint, by Gilbert Jean.(Donahue, Timothy) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Megan Dunn. Deborah Johnson served on 10/17/2019, answer due 11/7/2019; JC Poe, Jr served on 10/17/2019, answer due 11/7/2019. (AKD) |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Complaint, #9 Summons Issued Notice of Service of Summons and Complaint Acknowledgement filed by Megan Dunn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Allen, Andrew) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Deborah Johnson, and JC Poe, Jr. mailed certified mail (AKD) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Gilbert Jean, Marcus O'Mary and Roger Wilson, returned to Plaintiff for service on this the 15th day of October, 2019. (JLC) |
Filing Fee received in the amount of $400.00, Credit Card receipt_number 1126-3456904, NDAL receipt #B4601101316.(Allen, Andrew) Modified on 10/16/2019 (JLC). |
Filing 8 Request for service by certified mail filed by Megan Dunn. (Allen, Andrew) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Amended Complaint) against All Defendants, filed by Megan Dunn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6 - Part One, #7 Exhibit 6 - Part 2)(Allen, Andrew) |
Filing 6 ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend. #5 Themotion #5 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file her First AmendedComplaint as a separate docket entry. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/11/2019. (PSM) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Jane Doe #4. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Amended Complaint, #2 Appendix 1, #3 Appendix 2, #4 Appendix 3, #5 Appendix 4, #6 Appendix 5, #7 Appendix 6 - Part 1, #8 Appendix 6 - Part 2)(Allen, Andrew) |
Filing 4 ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation'sMotion to Require Jane Doe #4 to Reveal Her Identity. #2 For the reasonsstated in #9 of Bridges v. Poe et al., 7:19-cv-00529-LSC, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed anonymously in this action, and Defendant's motion #2 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff has eleven (11) days from the date of this Order to file an amended pleading identifying herself, or her action will be dismissed. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/3/2019. (PSM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly S DeShazo on behalf of Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation (DeShazo, Kimberly) |
Filing 2 MOTION S MOTION TO REQUIRE JANE DOE #4 TO REVEAL HER IDENTITY by Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation. (Speagle, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alabama Municipal Insurance Corporation, Gilbert Jean, Deborah Johnson, Marcus O'Mary, JC Poe, Jr, Roger Wilson, filed by Jane Doe #4. (Attachments: #1 Attachment #1, #2 Attachment #2, #3 Attachment #3, #4 Attachment #4, #5 Attachment #5)(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.