Prince v. City of Northport, Alabama
Emmitt Prince |
City of Northport, Alabama and Northport, Alabama, City of |
7:2019cv01854 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/30/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 11/6/2020. Joint Status Report due by 10/14/2020. Jury Trial set for 4/19/2021 at 9:00 AM in Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 12/19/2019. (PSM) |
Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Henderson, Bruce) |
Filing 5 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 12/10/2019. (PSM) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Northport, Alabama, City of.(Henderson, Bruce) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emmitt Prince. City of Northport, Alabama served on 11/20/2019, answer due 12/11/2019. (KAM) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Northport, Alabama mailed certified mail. (AKD) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601102132 (AKD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Northport, Alabama, filed by Emmitt Prince. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.