Simmons v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Plaintiff: Gregory Simmons
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Case Number: 7:2019cv02123
Filed: December 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 2/21/2020. (PSM)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mercedes-Benz US International Inc. filed by Mercedes-Benz US International Inc (Lucas, Michael)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mercedes-Benz US International Inc.(Lucas, Michael)
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Simmons. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020. (KEK)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Mercedes-Benz US International Inc. Sent via certified mail. (KEK)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Request for service by certified mail filed by Gregory Simmons. (Winston, Lee)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER The Court has for consideration Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceedwithout prepayment of the filing fee #2 and Plaintiff's motion to seal andsubstitute certain exhibits #3 . Plaintiff's motion to proceed withoutprepayment #2 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion to seal and substitute #3 is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff's exhibit ( #2 -1) is hereby SEALED. Having sealed this exhibit, the Court finds that it is not necessary to substitute Plaintiff's attached filing. ( #3 -1.) Instead, Plaintiff's motion to substitute #3 is GRANTED IN PART only to the extent that his attached filing ( #3 -1) may serve as a publicly available version of his original exhibit ( #2 -1). Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/22/2020. (PSM)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Seal Document and Substitute by Gregory Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Simmons Redacted Medical Record)(Winston, Lee)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to waive prepayment of filing fee by Gregory Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Medical Records, #2 Exhibit Short Form to Waive Filing Fee)(Winston, Lee)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mercedes-Benz US International Inc, filed by Gregory Simmons.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simmons v. Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Simmons
Represented By: Lee David Winston
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz US International Inc
Represented By: Michael L Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?