Dukes Clothing LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Plaintiff: Dukes Clothing LLC
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Case Number: 7:2020cv00860
Filed: June 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Gray M Borden
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT ORDER: The joint #13 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. All deadlines in the #9 Rule 26 Order are EXTENDED as requested by the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 07/30/2020. (SUH)
July 30, 2020 Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time Motion for Suspension of Rule 26 Deadlines by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. (Dowd, Augusta)
July 27, 2020 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The waiver sent on 7/27/2020, answer due 9/25/2020. (Dowd, Augusta)
July 27, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by William Chambers Waller, IV on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Waller, William)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 7/24/2020. (KAM)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 7/24/2020. (KAM)
July 10, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden filed by Dukes Clothing LLC, Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (KAM)
July 8, 2020 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Dowd, Augusta)
July 1, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig A. Shirley on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Shirley, Craig)
July 1, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Augusta S Dowd on behalf of Cincinnati Insurance Company, The (Dowd, Augusta)
June 24, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cincinnati Insurance Company, The. mailed certified mail (KAM)
June 17, 2020 Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Dukes Clothing LLC. (Glover, R)
June 17, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL (KAM)
June 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, filed by Dukes Clothing LLC.(KAM)
June 17, 2020 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3612444. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Cincinnati Insurance Company, The, filed by Dukes Clothing LLC.(KAM). (Glover, R) NDAL rec# B4601106629 Modified on 6/18/2020 (KAM, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dukes Clothing LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dukes Clothing LLC
Represented By: P Ted Colquett
Represented By: R Matt Glover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Represented By: Augusta S Dowd
Represented By: William Chambers Waller, IV
Represented By: Craig A. Shirley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?