McDaniel v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc.
Creed P McDaniel |
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc. |
7:2020cv01064 |
July 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. § 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint Amended Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc..(Graham, John) |
|
|
|
Filing 17 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Creed P McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Tidmore, David) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION for Hipaa Order filed by Creed P McDaniel. (Tidmore, David) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Conference set for 9/11/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge L. Scott Coogler. Counsel are to dial 877-336-1828 and use Access Code 3967498 five (5) minutes prior to the start of the conference. (LSB) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Conference set for 9/8/2020 at 9:30 AM before Judge L Scott Coogler. Counsel are to call 877-336-1828 and use Access Code 3967498 five (5) minutes prior to the start of the conference. (PSM) |
|
Filing 14 MOTION for Hipaa Order by Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc.. (Graham, John) |
|
Filing 12 Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Applicant Evan S. Abel, Esq. by Creed P McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from The Florida Bar, #2 Exhibit Consent of Designated Local Counsel)(Tidmore, David) |
Filing 11 Second MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Applicant Howard A. Spier, Esq. by Creed P McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from The Florida Bar, #2 Exhibit Consent of Designated Local Counsel)(Tidmore, David) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Graham, John) |
Filing 9 Before the Court are two motions for leave to appear pro hac vice. #6 and #7 Both motions fail to comply with Rule 83.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. The applicants fail to (1) provide a facsimile number for local counsel; and (2) provide written consent from local counsel. Accordingly, both motions are DENIED. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/28/2020. (PSM) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by J Christopher Johnston on behalf of Creed P McDaniel (Johnston, J) |
Filing 7 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Applicant Evan S. Abel, Esq. by Creed P McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from The Florida Bar)(Tidmore, David) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Applicant Howard A. Spier, Esq. by Creed P McDaniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from The Florida Bar)(Tidmore, David) |
PHV Fee paid: $75, receipt number B4601108008 (AKD) |
PHV Fee paid: $75, receipt number B4601108007 (AKD) |
|
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc.. filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc. (Graham, John) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc..(Graham, John) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3640966 (B4601107464). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc., filed by Creed P McDaniel.(PSM). (Tidmore, David) Modified on 7/31/2020 (AKD). |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Creed P McDaniel. (PSM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc., filed by Creed P McDaniel.(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.