Jones v. Garrett
| William P. Barr |
| Christie Jones |
| C Garrett |
| 7:2020cv01441 |
| September 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time by William P. Barr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Jones Release Date)(Marshall, Mary)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Lester Marshall on behalf of William P. Barr (Marshall, Mary)
|
|
Filing 4
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The undersigned again ORDERS Respondent to appear and show cause in writing within twenty (20) days from the entry date of this Order, why the relief requested by Petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/4/2020. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of filing by Christie Jones (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER This is an action on a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Christie Jones. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.Respondent is ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing within twenty (20) days from the entry date of this Order, why the relief requested by Petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/2/2020. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00 B4601108694), filed by Christie Jones.(MEB2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
