Bridges v. Warden et al
| Comulus L Bridges |
| Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama and William Barr |
| 7:2020cv01646 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| John H England |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER terming motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 12/10/2020. (PSM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Comulus L Bridges. (AKD) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Comulus L Bridges. (MEB2) |
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING The plaintiff's complaint is deficient for the reasons indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within 30 days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained below. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(PSM)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama, Warden, filed by Comulus L Bridges.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
