Monroe v. State of Alabama DOC
| James Kelly Monroe |
| State of Alabama DOC, Seargent Sealey, Colonel Woods, Seargent Jemison and Colonel Pyroy |
| 7:2020cv01660 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of James Kelly Monroe until the full filing fee has been witheld and paid to the Clerk of Court to saitsfy the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/07/2020. (AKD)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend Complaint by James Kelly Monroe. (AKD) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by James Kelly Monroe (AKD) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/27/2020. (AKD)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Kelly Monroe. (AKD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Alabama DOC, filed by James Kelly Monroe.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
