Jefferson Loft LLC v. Construction Enterprises Inc et al
| Jefferson Loft LLC |
| Phoenix Framing LLC and Construction Enterprises Inc |
| 7:2021cv00389 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 ***Document Sealed*** (Unredacted) Supplemental Exhibit to #23 RESPONSE re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (FILED UNDER SEAL pursuant to Order 22) (MEB2) |
| Filing 23 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), #17 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal filed by Jefferson Loft LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Redacted)Supplemental Exhibit to Response)(Leavens, Joseph) |
Filing 22
TEXT ORDER: The plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal #17 is GRANTED. The plaintiff is DIRECTED to file two versions of its response brief. The plaintiff may file the first version under seal. The second version, which the plaintiff may not file under seal, must redact or "black out" whatever information the plaintiff contends is confidential or proprietary. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 05/07/21. (CMB)
|
|
Filing 21
TEXT ORDER: Attorney Laura C. Bell moved to withdraw from her representation of Defendant Construction Enterprises, Inc. Her motion #15 is GRANTED. Laura C. Bell is TERMINATED as an attorney of record. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/7/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER: The defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #16 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 05/07/21. (CMB)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY Brief filed by Defendant Phoenix Framing LLC re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Phoenix Framing LLC. (Glick, Howard) |
|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/31/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 4/29/2022. Joint Status Report due by 4/14/2022. Bench Trial set for 8/15/2022 at 9:00 AM in Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 4/30/2021. (PSM)
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal by Jefferson Loft LLC. (Leavens, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Phoenix Framing LLC. (Glick, Howard) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Bell, Laura) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Jefferson Loft LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Leavens, Joseph) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand filed by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Grayson, Bryan) |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Leavens, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 REPLY Brief filed by Defendant Construction Enterprises Inc re: #10 Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(Grayson, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jefferson Loft LLC. (Leavens, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Two motions are before the Court: Defendant Phoenix Framing LLC's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. ( #6 and #8 ) Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days from this Order's entry to respond to Defendant Phoenix Framing LLC's motion #6 . Plaintiff will then have seven (7) days to file a reply. Defendants have fourteen (14) days from this Orders entry to respond to Plaintiff's motion #8 . Plaintiff does not have leave to file a reply. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 4/14/2021. (PSM)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Jefferson Loft LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Taunton, Michael) |
| Filing 7 Brief re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Glick, Howard) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Phoenix Framing LLC. (Glick, Howard) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3810849 (B4601112410). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Jefferson Loft LLC, filed by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Phoenix Framing LLC Consent to Removal, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(KEK). (Grayson, Bryan) Modified on 4/2/2021 (MRR, ). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Defendant Construction Enterprises' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is before the Court. #3 Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days from this Order's entry to respond. Defendant Construction Enterprises will then have seven (7) days to file a reply. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 4/1/2021. (PSM)
|
| Filing 4 Brief re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Grayson, Bryan) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Grayson, Bryan) |
|
Filing 2
UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 3/19/2021. (PSM)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Jefferson Loft LLC, filed by Construction Enterprises Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4 - Phoenix Framing LLC Consent to Removal, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
