Payne v. Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
Ulysses Payne |
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc doing business as Solco Helathcare LLC, Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc, Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical, Hetero Labs Limited, Hetero USA Inc, Torrent Pharma Inc, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited and Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc |
7:2021cv00495 |
April 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying #6 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 6/1/21. (MRR, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum Law in Support filed by Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc, Torrent Pharma Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Parker, George) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. filed by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc (Parker, George) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.(Parker, George) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time and to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Ulysses Payne. (Brooks, Gerald) |
Filing 9 ORDER The plaintiff's Motion to Remand is before the Court #6 . The defendant has ten (10) days from this Order's entry to respond. The plaintiff will thereafter have seven (7) days to file a reply.The defendant's Motion to Stay is also before the Court #8 . This motion is DENIED. The Court retains jurisdiction to rule on the pending Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 4/19/2021. (PSM) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time and to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Brannen, Franklin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Ulysses Payne (Brooks, Gerald) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Memorandum Law in Support by Ulysses Payne. (Brooks, Gerald) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc. filed by Camber Pharmaceuticals Inc (Brannen, Franklin) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. filed by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc (Parker, George) |
Filing 3 Defendant Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.(Parker, George) |
Filing 2 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 4/7/2021. (PSM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc from Circuit Court of Sumter County, case number 60-cv-2021-900022., filed by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(PSM) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3814130 (B4601112525). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc from Circuit Court of Sumter County, case number 60-cv-2021-900022., filed by Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D) (PSM). (Parker, George) Modified on 4/7/2021 (MEB2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.