TitleMax of Alabama Inc v. Burrell
| TitleMax of Alabama Inc |
| Kacey Lavonn Burrell |
| 7:2021cv01716 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Corey L Maze |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES re: Bankruptcy Rule 8018. (KEK) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to re (3 in 7:21-cv-01602-CLM), (9 in 7:21-cv-01602-CLM) filed by C David Cottingham. Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7:21-cv-01660-CLM, 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 7:22-cv-00139-CLM(Johnson, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD ON APPEAL (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Certificate of Record on Appeal, #3 Filed Submission Sheet, #4 Notice of Appeal, #5 Order Confirming, #6 Order Overruling, #7 Statement of Issues on Appeal, #8 Transcript of the Confirmation Hearing, #9 Appellant Designation of Record on Appeal, #10 1, #11 2, #12 3, #13 4, #14 5, #15 6, #16 Appellee Designation of Record on Appeal, #17 1, #18 2)(SRD, ) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Support re (7 in 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7 in 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 12 in 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7 in 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7 in 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 8 in 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 6 in 7:22-cv-00139-CLM, 10 in 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7 in 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 10 in 7:21-cv-01660-CLM) MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by TitleMax of Alabama Inc. Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7:21-cv-01660-CLM, 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 7:22-cv-00139-CLM(Butler, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Alter Judgment by C David Cottingham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Corrections, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Opinion)Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7:21-cv-01660-CLM, 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 7:22-cv-00139-CLM(Johnson, Joshua) |
Filing 6
ORDER The Court consolidated ten bankruptcy appeals. As explained in the Court's Order entered February 1, 2022 (Doc. #7 in 7:21-cv-1602-CLM), the Court invites the collective appellees to file a 10-page consolidated reply in support of certification to the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. That reply must be filed on or before Friday, February 11, 2022.The Court SUSPENDS all other dates and deadlines in these consolidated appeals pending further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/7/2022. Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7:21-cv-01660-CLM, 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 7:22-cv-00139-CLM(SRD, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER The Court GRANTS the appellees' motion to consolidate. (Doc. #3 ). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reassign 7:21-cv-1659-RDP, 7:21-cv-1660-MHH, 7:21-cv-1715-AKK, 7:21-cv-1716-AMM, 7:21-cv-1714-LSC, 7:22-cv-91-RDP, 7:22-cv-89-AMM, and 7:22-cv-139-LSC, to the undersigned. And the Court is also DIRECTED to consolidate those eight appeals, as well as 7:21-cv-1708-CLM (already assigned to the undersigned), with 7:21-cv-1602-CLM. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 2/7/2022. Associated Cases: 7:21-cv-01602-CLM, 7:21-cv-01659-CLM, 7:21-cv-01660-CLM, 7:21-cv-01708-CLM, 7:21-cv-01714-CLM, 7:21-cv-01715-CLM, 7:21-cv-01716-CLM, 7:22-cv-00089-CLM, 7:22-cv-00091-CLM, 7:22-cv-00139-CLM(SRD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT Case Reassigned to Judge Corey L. Maze. Judge Anna M. Manasco no longer assigned to the case. (SRD) |
| Cases associated with 7:21-cv-1602-CLM. (SRD) |
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Opposed Motion to Certify Direct Appeal by Kacey Lavonn Burrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Hambright AP Opinion, #2 Exhibit Statements of Issues on Appeal)(Bettis, Kathryn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: Parties must file with the Bankruptcy Court their designations, transcript(s) and a statement of the issues to complete the record on appeal. (DNW) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 21-70416-JHH13. File received filed by TitleMax of Alabama Inc. (Attachments: #1 docket sheet, #2 notice of appeal, #3 order confirming plan, #4 order overruling titlemax)(DNW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TitleMax of Alabama Inc v. Burrell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: TitleMax of Alabama Inc | |
| Represented By: | David A. Butler |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey L. Ingram |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: Kacey Lavonn Burrell | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Lila Bettis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
