Todd v. Tuscaloosa, City of et al
Plaintiff: Tami A Todd
Defendant: Tuscaloosa, City of, Walter Maddox and Executive Office of United States Attorneys, US Department of Justice
Case Number: 7:2022cv00025
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Gray M Borden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and #8 Amended Motion for Extension of Time to Answer are DENIED; the City of Tuscaloosa and Maddox shall answer or otherwise respond to Todd's Complaint no later than March 11, 2022; #11 Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 2/25/2022. (KAM)
February 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint [amended in order to append exhibits] filed by Walter Maddox, Tuscaloosa, City of. (Green, Wilson)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Statement of Facts filed by Tami A Todd (KAM)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed on US Dept of Justice by Tami A Todd. (green card signed; not dated) (KAM)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Sanctions by Tami A Todd. (KAM)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tami A Todd. Executive Office of United States Attorneys, US Department of Justice served on 1/24/2022, answer due 3/25/2022. (KAM)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Now pending are the motion and amended motion for an extension to file a responsive pleading filed by Defendants the City of Tuscaloosa (the City) and Walter Maddox. Docs. 7 & 8. Plaintiff Tami A. Todd shall file a response to the motions on or before February 9, 2022, and the defendants may file a reply in support of the motions on or before February 16, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 1/26/2022. (KAM)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint [amended in order to append exhibits] by Walter Maddox, Tuscaloosa, City of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC ALJ Decision (In Plaintiff's Prior Case), #2 Exhibit June 14, 2021 Termination Letter)(Green, Wilson)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Walter Maddox, Tuscaloosa, City of. (Green, Wilson)
January 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tami A Todd. Tuscaloosa, City of served on 1/10/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. (JLC)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Executive Office of United States Attorney delivered to plaintiff for service(KAM)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tami A Todd. Walter Maddox served on 1/7/2022, answer due 1/28/2022. (KAM)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Walter Maddox, Tuscaloosa, City of. (sent via certified mail), Summons Issued as to and U.S. Attorney General (returned to Plaintiff for service). (KEK)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tami A Todd. (KEK)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Executive Office of United States Attorneys, US Department of Justice, Walter Maddox, Tuscaloosa, City of (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number ALND B4601117803), filed by Tami A Todd.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Todd v. Tuscaloosa, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tami A Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tuscaloosa, City of
Represented By: Wilson Franklin Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter Maddox
Represented By: Wilson Franklin Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Executive Office of United States Attorneys, US Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?