Marshall v. Smith
Plaintiff: Bradley R Marshall
Defendant: Tonya Denise Smith and Chartmans LLC
Case Number: 7:2022cv00051
Filed: January 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith McKerall on behalf of Chartmans LLC (McKerall, Keith)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER This matter is before the court on DefendantsMotion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 10). Counsel for the parties SHALL meet and confer and file a joint report on or before Tuesday, April 26, 2022; If Defendant files a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, Defendant SHALL also contemporaneously file an answer that includes all defenses and counterclaims she wishes to assert; Plaintiff SHALL replead the complaint to include Chartmans, LLC as an additional plaintiff and in accordance with the Eleventh Circuits interpretation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8; Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 10) will no longer address the operative complaint, the motions are ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/24/2022. (KAM)
February 24, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Telephone Conference held on 2/24/2022. Counsel shall meet and confer and file a joint report as discussed. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint and allowed sufficient time to retain counsel. A separate order will be entered by the court. (Court Reporter Risa Entrekin.) (KLL)
February 22, 2022 Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and (7) filed by Tonya Denise Smith. (Linetsky, Yuri)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER The court RESETS the telephonic conference originally scheduled for Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:00 P.M. to the same day, February 24, 2022 at 10:30 A.M. Counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/22/2022. (KAM)
February 22, 2022 Filing 12 RESPONSE to #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bradley R Marshall. (KAM)
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ORDER The court was informally contacted by counsel. The parties are REMINDED to brief Defendants Motion to Dismiss #4 in accordance with the courts order 5 . The court SETS this matter for a telephonic conference on Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 3:00 P.M. Counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to dial-in to the conference by calling 866-434-5269 at the scheduled time. The access code is 6022965. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/18/2022. (KAM)
February 16, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and (7) filed by Bradley R Marshall. (KAM)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default; Defendant timely filed and served her motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 4). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default (Doc. # 7) is DENIED. The parties are REMINDED to brief Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) in accordance with the courts February 14, 2022 Text Order. (Doc. # 5).. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/16/2022. (KAM)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/16/2022. (KAM)
February 15, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Entry of Default by Bradley R Marshall. (KAM)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER Before the court is Defendants Motion to Dismiss #4 . The parties SHALL brief the motion as follows. Plaintiff SHALL file his response on or before Thursday, February, 24, 2022 and limit his brief to no more than twenty-five (25) pages. Defendant SHALL reply within five (5) days of the date that Plaintiff files his response. Defendant SHALL limit her reply to no more than ten (10) pages. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/14/2022. (KAM)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER Before the court is Defendants Motion to Dismiss #4 . The parties SHALL brief the motion as follows. Plaintiff SHALL file his response on or before Thursday, February, 24, 2022 and limit his brief to no more than twenty-five (25) pages. Defendant SHALL reply within five (5) days of the date that Plaintiff files his response. Defendant SHALL limit her reply to no more than ten (10) pages. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/14/2022. (KAM)
February 14, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and (7) by Tonya Denise Smith. (Linetsky, Yuri)
February 4, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bradley R Marshall. Tonya Denise Smith served on 1/25/2022, answer due 2/15/2022. (KAM)
January 24, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Tonya Denise Smith. Returned to plaintiff for service. (MEB2)
January 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tonya Denise Smith (Filing fee $ 402. rec# B4601117938), filed by Bradley R Marshall.(KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley R Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonya Denise Smith
Represented By: Grayson Miller
Represented By: Scott A Sloss
Represented By: Yuri Roger Linetsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chartmans LLC
Represented By: Keith McKerall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?