Tran et al v. Jaddou
| Sang Thanh Tran, Tien Thuy Tran, B-G-T-, T-G-T- and C-N-T- |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 7:2022cv00417 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sang Thanh Tran, Tien Thuy Tran, T-G-T-, C-N-T-, B-G-T-. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Shah, Sunny) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General delivered to plaintiff for service (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, filed by Sang Thanh Tran, Tien Thuy Tran, T-G-T-, C-N-T-, B-G-T-. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(PSM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4052315. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, filed by Sang Thanh Tran, Tien Thuy Tran, T-G-T-, C-N-T-, B-G-T-. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H)(PSM). (Shah, Sunny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
