Hall et al v. Coal Bed Services Inc. et al
Demarkus Hall and Eddie Hughes |
Coal Bed Services Inc. and Pate Holdings Inc. |
7:2022cv00513 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes as to Coal Bed Services Inc.. (KEK) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes. Pate Holdings Inc. served on 5/31/2022, answer due 6/21/2022. (KEK) |
Filing 7 Alias Summons Issued as to Coal Bed Services Inc.mailed certified mail. (KAM) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Pate Holdings Inc.mailed certified mail (KAM) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes as to Coal Bed Services Inc.. (KAM) |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes as to Pate Holdings Inc.. (KAM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Coal Bed Services Inc., Pate Holdings Inc.mailed certified mail. (KAM) |
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number B4601119976 (KAM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes Notice of Proposed Summons (Coal Bed) (Attachments: #1 Summons-Coal Bed)(McGinley, Rachel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coal Bed Services Inc., Pate Holdings Inc., filed by Demarkus Hall, Eddie Hughes.(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.