Stewart v. RM Transportation Inc et al
Plaintiff: Jaylin Stewart
Defendant: RM Transportation Inc and Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo
Case Number: 7:2022cv01316
Filed: October 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(f). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/22/22. (SAC)
November 21, 2022 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo, RM Transportation Inc.(Jaskolka, Marcus)
November 7, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaylin Stewart, unsigned and undated. (JLC)
November 3, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaylin Stewart. RM Transportation Inc served on 11/3/2022 (no state on green card), answer due 11/24/2022. (KSS)
October 27, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo, mailed certified mail. (KSS)
October 27, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to RM Transportation Inc., mailed certified mail. (KSS)
October 27, 2022 Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Jaylin Stewart. (Knowles, Jeremy)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 10/24/22. (SAC)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TEXT ORDER - This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee. On or before October 27, 2022, Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not comply with this order, the court may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 10/21/22. (SAC)
October 21, 2022 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4194535. NDAL receipt number 1793. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo, RM Transportation Inc, filed by Jaylin Stewart.(KAM). (Knowles, Jeremy)
October 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo, RM Transportation Inc, filed by Jaylin Stewart.(KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. RM Transportation Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaylin Stewart
Represented By: Jeremy L Knowles
Represented By: Luke Monroe Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RM Transportation Inc
Represented By: Marcus A Jaskolka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arreguin Paredes Lonzalo
Represented By: Marcus A Jaskolka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?