Garrard v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Bridgett Eady Garrard
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 7:2022cv01592
Filed: December 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Corey L Maze
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE by Social Security Administration, Commissioner of filing of transcript of administrative record (Attachments: #1 certification page, #2 court transcript index, #3 documents related to administrative process including transcript of oral hearing, #4 payment documents and decisions, #5 jurisdictional documents and notices part 1, #6 jurisdictional docusments and notices part 2, #7 jurisdictional documents and notices part 3, #8 jurisdictional documents and notices part 4, #9 jurisdictional documents and notices part 5, #10 non disability related development, #11 disability related development part 1, #12 disability related development part 2, #13 medical records part 1, #14 medical records part 2, #15 medical records part 3, #16 medical records part 4)(Rogers, Kristin)
February 16, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin Marie Rogers on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Rogers, Kristin)
January 3, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack B Hood on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Hood, Jack)
December 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER GRANTING motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #2 ). Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 12/27/2022. (KAM)
December 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Choi, Sarah)
December 21, 2022 NOTICE that counsel for plaintiff is required to provide the plaintiff's social security number to the US Attorney's Office within 10 days. This notice is to be made outside the electronic case filing (ECF) system. (CTF)
December 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bridgett Eady Garrard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IFP Affidavit)(CTF)
December 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner, filed by Bridgett Eady Garrard on this 20th day of December, 2022. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CTF)
December 20, 2022 Social Security Answer Deadline, Answer due 2/18/2023. (CTF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garrard v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bridgett Eady Garrard
Represented By: Jason P. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Represented By: Jack B Hood
Represented By: Kristin Marie Rogers
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?