Moore v. Neely
Petitioner: Kenynia Moore
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Case Number: 7:2023cv00536
Filed: April 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Referring Judge: Nicholas A Danella
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to re #6 filed by Kenynia Moore. (KSS)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDMENT to Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by Kenynia Moore.(KSS)
June 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER The purpose of this order is to notify Petitioner Moore that the court deems this case as ripe for summary disposition. Petitioner is ORDERED to file a reply addressing the defenses in the answer within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 6/8/2023. (KSS)
June 8, 2023 Opinion or Order MOTION for Summary Judgment by Kimberly Neely (treating doc. #6 response as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to order doc. #8 . (KSS)
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Cowan on behalf of Kimberly Neely (Cowan, Chad)
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE to re #5 Order to Show Cause and to re #1 Petition filed by Kimberly Neely. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Cowan, Chad) (treated as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to order doc. #8 ) Modified on 6/8/2023 (KSS).
May 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Respondent Kimberly Neely is ORDERED to show cause in writing within 21 days, why Mr. Moore's petition should not be granted. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on petitioner. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to provide to the US Attorney for NDAL a copy of this order and the petition for a wri of habeas corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 5/18/2023. (KSS)
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number B-5297. (KSS)
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Because Moore appears able to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED. If she wishes to continue this action, Moore is ORDERED to forward to the Clerk of Court a check or money order in the amount of $5.00 made payable to the "Clerk, United States District Court" within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 5/4/2023. (KSS)
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenynia Moore. (KSS)
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re: case number as to by Kenynia Moore. (KSS)
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kenynia Moore.(KSS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Neely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenynia Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Represented By: Chad Cowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?