Martinez-Leos v. Neely et al
Yessica Arely Martinez-Leos |
Kimberly Neely and C Peters |
7:2023cv00895 |
July 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Anna M Manasco |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE to re #4 Order to Show Cause filed by Kimberly Neely, C Peters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Cowan, Chad) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad Cowan on behalf of Kimberly Neely, C Peters (Cowan, Chad) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-Respondents are ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 08/07/2023. (AKD) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number B-6637 (AKD) |
Filing 3 ORDER-The petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee of $5. The petitioner must file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5 to the Clerk of Court. The petitioner must correct this deficiency within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 07/17/2023. (AKD) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re Case Number (AKD) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Yessica Arely Martinez-Leos.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.