Hernandez et al v. Adams et al
Juan Hernandez and Margarita Hernandez |
Justen Kase Adams and Cornerstone Civil Contractors, LLC |
7:2024cv00014 |
January 5, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Glick, Howard) |
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Justen Kase Adams.(Glick, Howard) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Cornerstone Civil Contractors, LLC.(Glick, Howard) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to re #5 Order to Show Cause filed by Juan Hernandez, Margarita Hernandez. (Riley, Kenneth) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed via certified mail by Juan Hernandez, Margarita Hernandez. Justen Kase Adams served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024; Cornerstone Civil Contractors, LLC served on 1/20/2024, answer due 2/10/2024. (RMM) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Justen Kase Adams, Cornerstone Civil Contractors, LLC, via certified mail. (RMM) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Juan Hernandez, Margarita Hernandez. (Riley, Kenneth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Justen Kase Adams, Cornerstone Civil Contractors, LLC, filed by Juan Hernandez, Margarita Hernandez.(RMM) |
Filing fee received: $ 405, receipt number B-9395. (RMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.