Maritza v. Neely
| Claudia Lorza Maritza |
| Neely |
| 7:2024cv00145 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: The purpose of this order is to notify the petitioner that the court deems this case to be ripe for summary disposition on the basis of the defenses in the Answer. For this reason, it is ORDERED that the petitioner must file a reply addressing the defenses in the Answer within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 3/26/2024. (DNW)
|
| MOTION for Summary Judgment pursuant to Order #6 . (DNW) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to re #3 filed by Neely. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Agency Declaration), #2 Attachment A to Agency Declaration (2023 Removal Order), #3 Attachment B to Agency Declaration (2013 Removal Order), #4 Attachment C to Agency Declaration (Admin Remedy Report))(LaGanke, Alex) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alex LaGanke on behalf of Neely (LaGanke, Alex) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondent is ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 3/5/24. (SAC) Modified on 3/5/2024 (SAC).
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 10326. (SAC) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER The petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Doc. 1). The petition stands deficient for the following reason: The petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee of $5. The petitioner must file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5 to the Clerk of Court. If the petitioner files an application to proceed in forma pauperis, she must sign the application and attach a certified copy of her jail or prison account statements for the last six months. The petitioner must correct this deficiency within 30 days. If she does not correct the deficiency by this deadline, the court may dismiss this action for want of prosecution without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the form application to proceed in forma pauperis on the petitioner along with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 2/8/2024. (RMM)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Claudia Lorza Maritza.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maritza v. Neely | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Claudia Lorza Maritza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Neely | |
| Represented By: | Alex LaGanke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
