SEC v. Poirier, et al
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Robert D Poirier, Robert J Palm, James R Vincent, Ty Poirier, Todd Poirier, Westend Investmens LLC and Landmarc Capital & Investment Company |
| 2:1996cv02243 |
| September 30, 1996 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405
ORDER granting the 404 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. The final accounting is approved and the Clerk of the Court shall issue checks as ordered in paragraphs 3 to 5. After the checks referred to in paragraphs 3 to 5, supra, have been issued, and the Commission staff has confirmed with the Clerk that these checks have been negotiated, the Clerk shall transfer any remaining funds, and any future funds received in this matter, less any applicable court fees, by check payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Upon payment of all remaining taxes, fees and expenses, the Commission shall remit all remaining funds in this matter to the U.S. Treasury. Upon transfer of the remaining funds to the U.S. Treasury, the Distribution Agent is discharged and the Fair Fund is terminated. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 09/17/2015. (ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
