Scott, et al v. Schriro, et al

Case Number: 2:1997cv01554
Filed: July 25, 1997
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 24, 2011 257 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - that Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are denied with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting a certificate of appealability on Petitioner's claim that counsel performed ineffectively at sentencing by faili ng to investigate and present mitigating evidence of Petitioner's traumatic brain injuries and their effect on his mental processes. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court declines to grant a certificate of appealability on Petitioner' s other claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and send copies of the Order to all counsel of record, to Petitioner, and to the Capital Case Staff Attorney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order to Rachelle M. Resnick, Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court, 1501 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007-3329. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/21/11. (KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott, et al v. Schriro, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?