Scott, et al v. Schriro, et al
2:1997cv01554 |
July 25, 1997 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office |
Paul G Rosenblatt |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 257 ORDER - that Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are denied with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting a certificate of appealability on Petitioner's claim that counsel performed ineffectively at sentencing by faili ng to investigate and present mitigating evidence of Petitioner's traumatic brain injuries and their effect on his mental processes. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court declines to grant a certificate of appealability on Petitioner' s other claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and send copies of the Order to all counsel of record, to Petitioner, and to the Capital Case Staff Attorney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court forward a copy of this Order to Rachelle M. Resnick, Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court, 1501 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007-3329. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/21/11. (KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scott, et al v. Schriro, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.