Schad, et al v. Stewart, et al
Edward Harold Schad |
Terry Stewart and George Herman |
2:1997cv02577 |
December 16, 1997 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Roslyn O Silver |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 151 ORDER dismissing as an unauthorized second or successive petition 145 Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/18/13.(MAP) |
Filing 149 ORDER that Petitioner's 148 Motion for Leave to File Oversized Reply is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner's Reply to Response to Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/13/2013.(LFIG) |
Filing 144 ORDER that Petitioner's 142 Motion for Leave to File Oversized Motion for Relief from Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner's 143 Lodged Motion. ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner' ;s Motion for Relief from Judgment no later than Friday, September 6, 2013. Because the state court record has been returned to the Arizona Supreme Court, the response shall include as exhibits any parts of the state record Respondents believe are necessary for the Court's consideration of the motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner may file a reply no later than Friday, September 13, 2013. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/27/2013.(LFIG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.