Runningeagle, et al v. Ryan, et al
Case Number: 2:1998cv01903
Filed: October 21, 1998
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER - On July 18, 2012, the Ninth Circuit ordered this Court to reconsider, in light of Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), its procedural default rulings on a number of claims alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and sentencin g. (Doc. 139 .) Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the procedural default of Claims 1-D, 1-H, and 17 is not excused under Martinez. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED expanding the record to include Exhibits 810 and 1221 to Petitioner's Supplement Brief. (Doc. [149 ]-1.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward of copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and shall terminate this matter, re 9CCA #07-99026 as to Notice of Appeal 135 . Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/2/2014. (See Order for full details.)(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Runningeagle, et al v. Ryan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?