Hooper, et al v. Schriro, et al
Murray Hooper |
Dora B Schriro |
2:1998cv02164 |
December 1, 1998 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Stephen M McNamee |
Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 168 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Claim 4 is DENIED as procedurally barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hooper's request to amend his petition to include Claim 16 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hooper's request to expand the record with the materials attached to his supplemental brief and reply brief (Docs. 147 -1, 157 -1) is GRANTED. His requests for discovery and an evidentiary hearing are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is GRANTED as to both remanded issues. (See document for complete details. Ninth Circuit case number: 08-99024). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/30/18. (SLQ) |
Filing 156 ORDER granting 154 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply Brief. Petitioner shall file his reply brief no later than 7/27/205. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/15/2015. (ACL) |
Filing 146 ORDER granting Petitioner's 145 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner shall file his supplemental brief addressing the Martinez and Claim 16 issues no later than February 23, 2015. Respondents shall file their response to the supplemental brief no later than April 24, 2015. Petitioner shall file his reply to the supplemental brief no later than May 26, 2015. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 1/22/2015.(LFIG) |
Filing 144 ORDER granting 143 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner shall file his supplemental brief addressing the Martinez and Claim 16 issues no later than January 23, 2015. Respondents shall file their response to the supplemental brief no later than March 27, 2015. Petitioner shall file his reply to the supplemental brief no later than April 24, 2015. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 11/21/2014.(ALS) |
Filing 125 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER that Petitioner's Supplemental Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 29 31 is denied with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. ORDER that a Certificate of Appealability is granted as to the following issue: Claim 1 (see order for details). ORDER that the Clerk of Court send a courtesy copy of this Order to Rachelle M. Resnick, Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/9/08. (TLJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hooper, et al v. Schriro, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Murray Hooper | |
Represented By: | Dale A Baich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Dora B Schriro | |
Represented By: | Jon George Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.