FTC v. Netforce Seminars, et al
Case Number: 2:2000cv02260
Filed: April 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Contempt Defendants' motion to dismiss and to supplement briefing (Doc. 127 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/18/22. (MAW)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the FTC's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 131 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/30/22. (MAW)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Contempt Defendants' motion for an OSC (First Action, Doc. 123 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/28/22. (MAW)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the FTC's motion for contempt sanctions (First Action, Doc. 106 ) is denied without prejudice [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/22/22. (MAW)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting 102 FTC's motion for a modified briefing schedule. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FTC may file a motion for entry of civil contempt and compensatory contempt sanctions in FTC v. Netforce Seminars, 2:00-cv-002260, within 30 days of the issuance of an opinion in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, 19-508 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/19/21. (MAW)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the FTC's motions for an order to show cause (Docs. 78 , 91 ) are granted in part and denied in part. The Court will address the FTC's request for civil contempt sanctions in this action after it resolves the FTC's request for a permanent injunction in the Success By Health action. To the extent further sanctions-specific briefing is required, it will be solicited by separate order at an appropriate time [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/6/20. (MAW)
April 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defense Counsel's 86 89 motions to withdraw as counsel of record are granted. The Receiver shall be substituted as counsel of record for Success By Media Holdings Inc. and Success by Media LLC. Noland shall proceed pro se unless and until he retains new counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FTC and the Receiver shall confer and determine a workable schedule for the Receiver to respond to the FTCs pending discovery requests. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/2/2020. (MSA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FTC v. Netforce Seminars, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?