Jones v. Schriro, et al
| 2:2001cv00384 |
| February 28, 2001 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
255
ORDER - The Court rejects "Jones's argument that his ineffective assistance ofcounsel claims are unexhausted and therefore procedurally defaulted, and that deficient performance by his counsel during his post-conviction relief case in state court excuses the default." (Doc. 240 -2.) Having considered Jones's claims under Martinez and Dickens, this Court has notchanged its conclusion that Claims 20(O), (P), and (T) be dismissed with prejudice. (See document for complete details. Ninth Circuit Case Number, 07-99000). Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/24/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting 251 Respondents' Motion to Strike. Exhibits 26 and 27 to Jones's reply brief 250 are stricken from the record [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 6/15/16.(MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Schriro, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
