Allocco, et al v. Metropolitan Life
| 2:2001cv02220 |
| November 14, 2001 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| James A Teilborg |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
ORDER Dft's 159 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses is granted in part and denied in part. Dft's request for an award of attorneys' is granted as follows: The Court awards Dft $30,928.40 in attorneys' fees. Dft's request for an award of related non-taxable expenses is denied. That the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment on this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/29/09. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER granting 169 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis re 160 Notice of Appeal and denying 166 Motion to Receive Transcript of the 4/14/09 Trial Proceedings. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/24/09.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 111 Motion/Request for Trial by Jury is DENIED. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/23/08. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allocco, et al v. Metropolitan Life | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
