Hedlund, et al v. Ryan, et al
| Charles Michael Hedlund |
| Charles Goldsmith and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2002cv00110 |
| January 18, 2002 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| David G Campbell |
| Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER denying 150 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/28/09.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
147
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER. Petitioner's 71 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. The stay of execution entered by this Court on 1/22/02 3 is VACATED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL ABILITY IS GRANTED as to the following issues: Whether Claim 1 of the Amended Petition alleging that Petitioner's rights were violated by the use of a leg brace at his trial is without merit. Whether Claim 2 of the Amended Petition alleging that Petitioner's rights were violated by the use of dual juries is without merit. Whether Claim 7 of the Amended Petition alleging that Petitioner's rights were violated by the presence of a biased juror is without merit. The Clerk shall forward a courtesy copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/10/09. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
