Djerf v. Ryan, et al
| Richard Kenneth Djerf |
| George Herman and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2002cv00358 |
| February 27, 2002 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
IT IS ORDERED that Claim 3 is DENIED as procedurally barred, that Claim 5(2) is DENIED as moot, and that Claim 2 is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability as to Claims 2, 3, and 5(2). See Ninth Circuit Order 112 re: 08-99027 as to 101 Notice of Appeal. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 04/04/17. (KAS)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER denying Petitioner's 117 Motion for Leave to Issue Subpoena. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/12/15.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying 104 Petitioner's Request for Indication WhetherCourt Would Consider Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) ; denying as moot 110 Respondents' Motion for extention of time to submit its response to Petitioner's request for indication. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/6/09.(DMT, )
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Respondents' 108 Motion for an Extension of Time. Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's motion by 6/15/09. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/27/09.(SAT)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER AND AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; denying Petitioner's 97 Motion to alter or amend judgment; granting in part and denying in part petitioner's 98 Motion to expand his certificate of appealability; the Certificate of Appeal ability is amended to include the following issues: Whether the Court erred in determining that Claim One, alleging that Petitioner's waiver of counsel was involuntary because he was forced to proceed pro se due to incompetent counsel, is withou t merit, AND Whether the Court erred in determining that Claim Four, alleging ineffective assistance of at sentencing based on counsel's failure to investigate and present mitigation information regarding his dysfunctional family background and mental health, is without merit. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/30/08.(REW, )
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER that Petitioner's 55 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. The stay of execution entered by this court on 03/01/08 3 is VACATED. That a certificate of Appealability is GRANTED as to the following issue detailed in the attached pdf. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send a courtesy copy of this Order to Rachelle M. Resnick, Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 09/29/08. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
