Scottsdale Insurance v. Market Finders Ins
2:2004cv00118 |
January 20, 2004 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Stephen M McNamee |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 ORDER denying 146 Defendant's BILL OF COSTS with leave to refile after resolution of the appeal. Defendant may reinstate its motion at the proper time by filing a Notice of Renewal of Bill of Costs; Defendant need not refile the Bill of Costs itself. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/17/08. (LSP) |
Filing 156 ORDER denying 148 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees with leave to renew the motion after resolution of the appeal. Defendant may reinstate its motion at the proper time by filing a Notice of Renewal of Motion for Attorneys' Fees; Defendant need not refile the motion itself. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/14/08.(LSP) |
Filing 144 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 128 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this matter. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 09/11/08.(DNH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance v. Market Finders Ins | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.