Farrall v. Schriro, et al
| 2:2004cv00260 |
| February 4, 2004 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Earl H Carroll |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
CORRECTED ORDER re 111 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; denying without prejudice to refiling in the Ninth Circuit 110 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 12/7/10. (LSP)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying without prejudice 110 Petitioner's Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney.. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 12/7/10.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner's 103 Objections are overruled; the 102 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate judge is adopted in full as the Order of the Court; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed; a Certificate fo Appealability is denied as Petiitoner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 10/25/10. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Farrall v. Schriro, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
