Sekuk Global Ent, et al v. Apollo Group Inc, et al
2:2004cv02147 |
October 12, 2004 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
James A Teilborg |
Stockholders Suits |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 784 ORDER that NASI's 773 Petition for Attorneys' Fees is denied. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/2/2012.(LFIG) |
Filing 770 FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT granting 739 the Parties' Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement and Entry of Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal; granting 730 Plaintiff's Stipulation and Agreement regarding Final Approval Order and Judgment; granting 740 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees; and granting 747 Defendants' Motion to Vacate Judgment. The Clerk shall vacate 695 this Court's Judgment of April 6, 2011. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/20/12.(LSP) |
Filing 678 ORDER that Dfts' 669 Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs is denied. It is further ordered that Jonathan Lee Riches, Jalaluddin Haqqani, and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's 677 Motion to Intervene, Motion for Amicus Curiae Brief, Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 07/16/09.(ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sekuk Global Ent, et al v. Apollo Group Inc, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.