Vaught v. Scottsdale Healthcare Corporation Health Plan
| 2:2005cv00718 |
| March 7, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| David G Campbell |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER re briefing schedule of motions for judgment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/1/2009. (NVO)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER. Request to supplement administrative record with extrinsic evidence is granted; request to conduct discovery is granted in part and denied in part. The parties are directed to file a joint report setting forth a proposed schedule by 4/24/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/6/2009. (NVO)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER re additional briefing required. Plaintiff memorandum due 3/20/2009, defendant memorandum due 3/27/2009. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/10/2009. (NVO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vaught v. Scottsdale Healthcare Corporation Health Plan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
