The Medical Protective Company v. Pang
Case Number: 2:2005cv02924
Filed: September 21, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 339 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 329 Pang's Third Motion for Attorneys Fees, Costs, and Expenses, and awarding Pang a total of $117,687 in attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses, as described in the attached order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/19/2014.(ALS)
September 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 321 ORDER DENYING Dr. Pang's Second Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. 306). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/6/2011.(KMG)
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 311 ORDER denying 307 Defendant Pang's Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 308 Defendant Pang's Motion to Expedite; denying 310 Defendant Pang's Motion to Expedite. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 11/5/10.(TLJ)
October 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 305 ORDER that Defendant Dr. Herman Pang's 264 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is denied; that Plaintiff Medical Protective Company's 266 Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief is denied; that Plaintiff's 268 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) is denied; that Plaintiff's 269 Motion to Strike and Motion for Attorneys' Fees is denied; that Defendant's Rule 54 273 Motion Requesting Review and Revision of Clerk's 4/28/10 Order Re: Taxation of Costs is denied; that Defendant's 285 First, Second, Third, and Fourth Motions for Extension of Time to File Supplement are denied as moot. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/19/10. (ESL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Medical Protective Company v. Pang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?