Magna-RX, Inc. vs. Slepicoff et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Magna-RX, Inc. vs. Slepicoff et al

Magna-RX, Inc. vs. Slepicoff et al

Case Number:	2:2005cv03545
Filed:	November 2, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge:	Earl H Carroll
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 25, 2008	Filing 494 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 488 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment Without Hearing as follows: (1) Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages for copyright infringement (Count VIII) in the amount of $750 against e ach of the following Defendants: Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw; (2) Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages for trademark infringement (Count IV) in the amount of $500 against each of the following Defendants: Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw; (3) Plaintiff's request for a permanent injunction, as asserted in i ts Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, is denied without prejudice; Plaintiff's additional claims of Unfair Competition by Infringement of Common-Law Rights (Count V), violation of Lanham Act (Count VI), and Aiding and Abetting (Count VII), to the extent asserted against Defendants, if any, are dismissed; Plaintiff's request for entry of judgment against Defendants Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw is granted. The Court will enter separate default judgments against these Defendants consistent with this Order; the hearing is vacated as to pro se Defendant Harold Allen. The Motion for Entry of Default Judgment as to Harold Allen remains before the Court, pending further ruling of the Court. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 11/24/08. (REW, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 25, 2008

Filing 494 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 488 MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment Without Hearing as follows: (1) Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages for copyright infringement (Count VIII) in the amount of $750 against e ach of the following Defendants: Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw; (2) Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages for trademark infringement (Count IV) in the amount of $500 against each of the following Defendants: Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw; (3) Plaintiff's request for a permanent injunction, as asserted in i ts Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, is denied without prejudice; Plaintiff's additional claims of Unfair Competition by Infringement of Common-Law Rights (Count V), violation of Lanham Act (Count VI), and Aiding and Abetting (Count VII), to the extent asserted against Defendants, if any, are dismissed; Plaintiff's request for entry of judgment against Defendants Troy Holley, Amy Chen, ES Online, Innovative Nutraceuticals Corp, Intela Marketing LLC, Robert Sefaradi, and Daniel Shaw is granted. The Court will enter separate default judgments against these Defendants consistent with this Order; the hearing is vacated as to pro se Defendant Harold Allen. The Motion for Entry of Default Judgment as to Harold Allen remains before the Court, pending further ruling of the Court. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 11/24/08. (REW, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magna-RX, Inc. vs. Slepicoff et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?