Ochoa v. Ontiveros et al
| 2:2005cv03787 |
| November 21, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| David G Campbell |
| David K Duncan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Judge Duncan's 70 Report and Recommendation is accepted; Petitioner Ochoa's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed; denying Petitioner Ochoa's 77 Notice of substandard briefing and explanation which the Court treats as a motion for leave to file further objections to the R&R; denying without prejudice Petitioner Ochoa's 78 Motion to prepare a transcript free of cost; the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/24/09. (REW, )
|
|
Filing
70
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 02/17/09. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ochoa v. Ontiveros et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
