Ross v. Arpaio
| 2:2005cv04177 |
| December 20, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Edward C Voss |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER; the Court determines that by failing to assert the affirmative defense of nonexhaustion within the time period set by the Court, Defendant waived the defense and it may not be renewed at trial. The Court further finds that based on the information and arguments submitted up to this point whether Plaintiff filed sanitation grievances cannot be raised at trial for impeachment or credibility purposes. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/12/08. (REW, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ross v. Arpaio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
