Jones v. Arpaio et al
| 2:2006cv00544 |
| February 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Edward C Voss |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to file First Amended Complaint FURTHER ORDERED granting 10, 11 Motions to Set Aside Judgment FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk of Court must vacate and set aside the 6/8/06 Judgment 7 FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk must file Pla's First Amended Complaint 9 FURTHER ORDERED that Dft Arpaio must Answer Pla's First Amended Complaint FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Pla service packet for Dft Arpaio. Pla shall complete and return the svc pkt to the Court w/in 20 days of the file date of this Order...Service Packet due by 9/5/06 FURTHER ORDERED Dft shall answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion w/in the time provided by applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) Fed.R.Civ.P. FURTHER ORDERED this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 8/15/06. (MAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Arpaio et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
