Ochoa v. Arpaio
| 2:2006cv00719 |
| March 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER Pla's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Pla is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $250 for this action. An initial partial filing fee of $49.16 is assessed. FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is di smissed for failure to state a claim. Pla shall have 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an Amended Complaint FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk of Court shall enter dismissal of this action w/prejudice and w/out further notice to Pla if Pla fails to comply w/this Court's Order. Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk shall make an entry on the docket in this matter indicating that the dismissal of this action falls w/in the purview of 28 USC 1915(g) FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk of Court shall provide a current court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/23/06. (MAP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ochoa v. Arpaio | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
