Ochoa v. Arpaio
Case Number: 2:2006cv00719
Filed: March 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Pla's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. Pla is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $250 for this action. An initial partial filing fee of $49.16 is assessed. FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is di smissed for failure to state a claim. Pla shall have 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an Amended Complaint FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk of Court shall enter dismissal of this action w/prejudice and w/out further notice to Pla if Pla fails to comply w/this Court's Order. Upon entry of judgment, the Clerk shall make an entry on the docket in this matter indicating that the dismissal of this action falls w/in the purview of 28 USC 1915(g) FURTHER ORDERED that the Clk of Court shall provide a current court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/23/06. (MAP, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ochoa v. Arpaio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?