Parker et al v. Witasick et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv00903
Filed: March 27, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: Mary H Murguia
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 30, 2009 132 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/30/09. (SAT)
August 26, 2009 110 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER having granted the Dfts' Motion 99 to Extend at least in part, FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING IN PART the Witasicks' Motion to Set Aside Default (Dkt. # 104) in that, the Court will not enter an order requiring the clerk to strike the Dft s' Answer and Counterclaim and/or enter default against the Dfts. FURTHER ORDERED DISMISSING Dfts' counterclaims. FURTHER ORDERED RESETTING trial to September 1, 2 and 3 and September 9, 10 and if needed September 11 to begin unless otherwi se ordered at 9:00 A.M. in this division. FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot by this Order and the Final Pretrial Order to be entered in this case, Plas' Motion 94 in Limine Re: to Exclude Evidence and Witnesses not Disclosed by Dfts, and Plas' Motion 93 in Limine Re: To Exclude Testimony re: Counterclaims and Affirmative Defenses. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/26/09.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker et al v. Witasick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?