Bixler v. Arpaio et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv02393
Filed: October 10, 2006
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Referring Judge: Edward C Voss (PS)
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 17, 2006 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed with the Complaint,is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a cl aim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without furth er notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Special Prisoner Deadline due by 11/17/2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/17/06. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bixler v. Arpaio et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?