Taser International Inc v. Stinger Systems, Inc.
| Taser International Inc |
| Stinger Systems, Inc. |
| Stinger Systems, Inc. |
| Taser International Inc |
| 2:2007cv00042 |
| January 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
ORDER denying 218 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 6/2/10.(KSP)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER denying in part and granting in part Stinger's Motion 160 for Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity or Noninfringement. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to claim 3 of the '870 patent, finding it invalid as obvious. Summary judgment is DENIED as to the rest of the grounds for relief set forth in Stinger's motion. Granting TASER's Motion 184 for Partial Summary Judgment of Literal Infringement. Denying as moot Stinger's request 194 for consolidated oral argument. A consolidated oral argument was held on March 23, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED denying TASER's Motion 197 for Leave to File Supplemental Counsel Declaration in Support of TASER's Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of L iteral Infringement. FURTHER ORDERED denying TASER's Motion 199 for Leave to File Surreply or in the Alternative to Strike Stinger Systems, Inc.'s Improper and Oversized Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting this matter for Status Hearing on April 19, 2010 at 4:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 3/31/10.(KMG)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER denying 55 Plaintiff TASER's Motion to Dismiss or Strike Defendant Stinger's inequitable conduct defenses for failure to plead with particularity under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 9/5/08.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
